Thursday, July 22, 2010

"Vain, Repetitious Prayer": Jesus, by His Own Example and Teaching, Illustrates What His Condemnation Does Not Mean / Other Related Examples

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_FOIrYyQawGI/TEjgUfvQaqI/AAAAAAAAC7Q/o3ZvT9WnRq0/s1600/GardenOfGethsemane.jpg
[ source ]

Did Jesus contradict His own advice about proper prayer at the Garden of Gethsemane?

[all verses RSV]

Matthew 6:7 And in praying do not heap up empty phrases [KJV: "vain repetitions"] as the Gentiles [KJV: "heathen"] do; for they think that they will be heard for their many words.

Sirach 7:14 Do not prattle in the assembly of the elders, nor repeat yourself in your prayer.

But Jesus shows even in the immediate context that not all repetition in prayer whatsoever is precluded, because two verses later He instructs them how to pray by teaching them the Lord's Prayer (the "Our Father"). Obviously, when He says, "Pray then like this," He clearly doesn't mean just one time. He means habitually -- and indeed many church services (like the Mass) regularly pray the Lord's Prayer: the most well-known Christian prayer of all.

The passage in Luke that contains the Our Father complements Matthew by making certain elements more clear. It shows us that Jesus is specifically teaching the disciples how to pray, by saying particular words. The phrase, "when you pray, say . . ." is almost like a formula for a regular practice of prayer. It's also notable because here the prayer is not in the context of the Sermon on the Mount, as in Matthew, but on another occasion (yet more evidence of its repetitious nature):

Luke 11:1-4 He was praying in a certain place, and when he ceased, one of his disciples said to him, "Lord, teach us to pray, as John taught his disciples." [2] And he said to them, "When you pray, say: "Father, hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. [3] Give us each day our daily bread; [4] and forgive us our sins, for we ourselves forgive every one who is indebted to us; and lead us not into temptation."

The intended repetition of the prayer is shown again by analogy in the same larger passage, with regard to the proper practice of fasting, where Jesus says, "when you fast, anoint your head and wash your face, that your fasting may not be seen by men but by your Father who is in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you" (Matt 6:17-18a). This is obviously intended to be a regular practice as well: not a one-time thing.

Therefore, by direct analogy, if this practice regarding fasting is to be a regular habit, so also the Lord's prayer is a regular habit, and so it is repetitious, but it is not an "empty phrase" or a "vain repetition."

Protestants who argue that all formal prayer that repeats phrases are "empty" or "vain" in fact manage to overlook the entire deeper meaning and import of this biblical narrative, in context. Jesus is recommending and exhorting His hearers to a genuine, humble piety of the heart, as opposed to an empty, shell-like, merely external piety, intended to be seen by men in a spiritually prideful sense. It's a classic case study of taking something completely out of context and absolutizing it, in gross violation of legitimate hermeneutical principles.

This theme of genuine vs. sham piety is seen throughout the first half of the chapter (part of the Sermon on the Mount):

Matthew 6:1-6, 16 "Beware of practicing your piety before men in order to be seen by them; for then you will have no reward from your Father who is in heaven. [2] "Thus, when you give alms, sound no trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may be praised by men. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward. [3] But when you give alms, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, [4] so that your alms may be in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you. [5] "And when you pray, you must not be like the hypocrites; for they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and at the street corners, that they may be seen by men. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward. [6] But when you pray, go into your room and shut the door and pray to your Father who is in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you. . . . [16] And when you fast, do not look dismal, like the hypocrites, for they disfigure their faces that their fasting may be seen by men. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward.

The same general idea occurs again in Mark and Luke:

Mark 12:38-40 And in his teaching he said, "Beware of the scribes, who like to go about in long robes, and to have salutations in the market places [39] and the best seats in the synagogues and the places of honor at feasts, [40] who devour widows' houses and for a pretense make long prayers. They will receive the greater condemnation."

Luke 20:46-47 "Beware of the scribes, who like to go about in long robes, and love salutations in the market places and the best seats in the synagogues and the places of honor at feasts, [47] who devour widows' houses and for a pretense make long prayers. They will receive the greater condemnation."

It's not that all long prayers are condemned, anymore than repetitious prayers are, but that prayers made with a pretentious, prideful spirit (showing off in front of men; making people think one is "super-pious") are condemned.

Lastly, when Jesus states: "do not heap up empty phrases as the Gentiles do," note that He is no longer talking about the Hebrew tradition of prayer (which quite obviously included much repetition, such as in the Psalms and priestly chants and prayers). He's not even talking about the Pharisees, because they weren't Gentiles. In other places (6:2, 5, and implied in context again in 6:16), He refers to practicing Jews, but now He mentions the Gentiles. Remember, this is before the Church was opened up to the Gentiles (after the day of Pentecost, after Jesus' death) and spread beyond the Jews.

Therefore, Jesus was referring to people like the pagan Romans and Greeks, and other non-Jews; people who had a different religion altogether. Thus, the KJV, NKJV, NEB , and REB versions use the word "heathen," and other translations (e.g., Phillips, TEV, Jerusalem, NIV) use the word "pagans" here.

It is not only a matter, then, of praying with "empty phrases" and "vain repetition" but also of praying "as the Gentiles / pagans / heathen do": in other words, of praying like those who practice an ultimately false religion. That element and the aspect of interior piety take the passage to a far deeper place than merely a discussion of repetition: let alone all repetition, as if God is condemning that.

Jesus then illustrates that He Himself is not opposed to all repetition in prayer, by the example of His own practice:

Matthew 26:39, 42, 44 And going a little farther he fell on his face and prayed, "My Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me; nevertheless, not as I will, but as thou wilt." . . . [42] Again, for the second time, he went away and prayed, "My Father, if this cannot pass unless I drink it, thy will be done." . . . [44] So, leaving them again, he went away and prayed for the third time, saying the same words.

Mark 14:39 And again he went away and prayed, saying the same words.

The following passage suggests to me (though I wouldn't make too much of it as an exegetical argument) formal, liturgical (hence, repetitious) prayers, by the phraseology "the prayers" rather than simply "prayer" (as in Acts 6:4) or "praying":

Acts 2:42 And they devoted themselves to the apostles' teaching and fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers. (cf. Acts 3:1: ". . . going up to the temple at the hour of prayer, the ninth hour," which may be related).

Moreover, further repetition occurs in repeated intercession for the same person or persons. For example:

Ephesians 1:16 I do not cease to give thanks for you, remembering you in my prayers,

Colossians 1:9
And so, from the day we heard of it, we have not ceased to pray for you, asking that you may be filled with the knowledge of his will in all spiritual wisdom and understanding,

Colossians 4:12
Ep'aphras, who is one of yourselves, a servant of Christ Jesus, greets you, always remembering you earnestly in his prayers, . . .

1 Thessalonians 1:2 We give thanks to God always for you all, constantly mentioning you in our prayers,

2 Thessalonians 1:11 To this end we always pray for you, that our God may make you worthy of his call, and may fulfil every good resolve and work of faith by his power,

2 Timothy 1:3 I thank God whom I serve with a clear conscience, as did my fathers, when I remember you constantly in my prayers.

Here are examples of relentlessly repeated prayer requests:

Luke 18:1-7 And he told them a parable, to the effect that they ought always to pray and not lose heart. [2] He said, "In a certain city there was a judge who neither feared God nor regarded man; [3] and there was a widow in that city who kept coming to him and saying, `Vindicate me against my adversary.' [4] For a while he refused; but afterward he said to himself, `Though I neither fear God nor regard man, [5] yet because this widow bothers me, I will vindicate her, or she will wear me out by her continual coming.'" [6] And the Lord said, "Hear what the unrighteous judge says. [7] And will not God vindicate his elect, who cry to him day and night? Will he delay long over them?

(cf. Lk 2:37: "She did not depart from the temple, worshiping with fasting and prayer night and day"; also 1 Tim 5:5: "continues in supplications and prayers night and day")

1 Thessalonians 3:10
praying earnestly night and day that we may see you face to face and supply what is lacking in your faith?

Two further examples from the Old Testament perhaps indicate (it's not absolutely clear, I grant) a single prayer being used repeatedly in one instance of praying:

Nehemiah 1:4-6 When I heard these words I sat down and wept, and mourned for days; and I continued fasting and praying before the God of heaven. [5] And I said, "O LORD God of heaven, the great and terrible God who keeps covenant and steadfast love with those who love him and keep his commandments; [6] let thy ear be attentive, and thy eyes open, to hear the prayer [singular] of thy servant which I now pray before thee day and night for the people of Israel thy servants, confessing the sins of the people of Israel, which we have sinned against thee. Yea, I and my father's house have sinned.

Psalm 141:5 . . . my prayer [singular] is continually against their wicked deeds.

See also the related papers:

A Fictional Dialogue on "Vain Repetition," the Mass, and the Liturgy

Biblical Evidence for Wholehearted Worship, Even in a "Ritualistic" or Formal Setting


***

11 comments:

Jordanes said...

"Vain repetitions" should more properly be rendered "babble on and on," or, "uttering meaningless repeated noises."

Jesus was referring to the kinds of chants common among the pagans in his day and still found today among some pagan cultures. If you want to see the kind of "prayer" Jesus condemned, look at some of the Gnostic writings in the Nag Hammadi collection. The difference between pagan meaningless prolonged chanting of vowels and prayer in the Jewish and Christian tradition is vast. Jesus is the Word made flesh, and His People address Him using ordered words, with vocabulary and syntax, not magical chants devoid of any linguistic "telos" or purpose or definition.

"Vain repetitions" has got nothing whatsoever to do with repeating a prayer several times.

Dave Armstrong said...

Excellent observations.

Martin said...

Off topic, I giggled at this

"CurtJester: Apologist Dave Armstrong will never be on Twitter. I think he sneezes and 500 words come out."
--http://www.twitter.com/CurtJester/status/19690851612

Dave Armstrong said...

LOL That's true, but for different reasons. I think the trend of one-liners on that and Facebook are not good overall for the world of ideas, so I refuse to start one of those pages or join any others. It's the latest gimmick, and I naturally oppose those.

And yes, I write a lot, but it's forgotten that I also have two works devoted to short answers: The New Catholic Answer Bible and The One-Minute Apologist. I also have many fairly short posts online, and the trend in my writing is generally towards brevity and shortness.

I think with me, the thing is prolific numbers of writings, but not necessarily always L O N G stuff.

Navin said...

Hey Dave, I pray for you. And all alike in catholic church. Please read your name types book- "Dave Hunt - A Woman Rides The Beast". i can give you so many scriptures, straight forward from the bible. Do not twist the word of God for your comfort, ask God what he wants. Basic question you should ask yourself is how ca a man be God? I am asking about your Pope! Does he not have to die one day? Remember, everyone has to stand at the judgement seat, repent and come out of that system please. The Vicar of christ or what he calls himself as the substitute for christ, is blasphemey, for christ is risen and he does not need a substitute, let alone a sinful man at that. May the holy spirit guide you. ----Navin

Edward T. Babinski said...

I think we agree that prayer can be repetitious, including weekly/daily prayers at Mass, daily devotionals, prayers at meals, etc., The Orthodox mystical classic, The Way of the Pilgrim also advocates the most repetitious prayer of all, repeating "Jee-sus" in one's head all day long to try and draw the mind continually toward the mind of Christ. So prayers can undoubtedly be repetitious. As for prayers also being vain, that remains in the eye of the beholder of whatever denomination one belongs to, when viewing the prayers of people in rival denominations and/or religions. I believe both Catholic and Baptist leaders have been guilty of saying things along the lines of "God does not listen to the prayers of a Jew, heretic, et al."

Edward T. Babinski said...

Jordanes, You think Jesus' words about avoiding vain and repetitious prayers was addressing "magical chants?" Well, maybe, if the Gospels were composed by Greek Christians retro-jecting their own Gnostic concerns back into the mouth of the historical Jesus.

As for prayers that "babble on and on," what about Pentecostals who claim to be speaking in tongues during some of their lengthy services?

Jordanes551 said...

The kinds of pagan chanting prayers to which I referred have long been found in numerous Gentiles cultures and have been around from time out of mind. There's no reason to think Jesus wasn't aware of them even though the examples I cite were composed by Gnostic heretics in the second and third centuries. We may also keep in mind that as God Incarnate He is aware of everything. So there is nothing anachronistic about Jesus forbidding that kind of prayer.

As for Pentecostals and their alleged speaking in tongues, a lot of it could well be just the kind of ecstatic, non-linguistic babble found in pagan worship.

Gregory said...

As a former Pentecostal who himself speaks in tongues, I quite resent that insinuation!

I will admit that much Pentecostal tongues-speaking (or even the same in Catholic charismatic groups) is done "incorrectly" according to the Pauline instructions of 1 Cor 12-14, but lets not dismiss outright something that Sacred Scripture itself says is (or at least can be) of the Holy Spirit.

Jordanes, I think you're band on with your understanding of Jesus' discussion of "vain repetition." I've also heard it explained in terms of actual phraseology, such that certain phrases were supposed to induce the deity to respond, because you invoked him or her just in the right way to elicit the response. When we speak with our Heavenly Father, Jesus is saying, we must not treat Him as if we can say just the right words, the right way, the right number of times, and it will automatically prompt Him to act.

Jordanes551 said...

It's far from clear that what is today known as "speaking in tongues" has anything to do with the spiritual gift described in Holy Scripture and the early Church Fathers. In particular we should also be hesitant about ascribing the phenomenon to the Holy Spirit when it is found among Oneness Pentecostals, who have a non-Christian understanding of God. With Trinitarian Pentecostals, of course, this wouldn't be so much a concern. Still, when a phenomenon is found throughout various religions, it's inevitable that a Christian question whether or not it originates with the Holy Spirit, particularly when there is little reason to believe this "gift" is building up the Catholic Church.

Gregory said...

A piece of anecdotal evidence for you, Jordanes. I used to work in a parish pastored by the chair of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal Services of Ontario. One time he was praying over a Malaysian couple in the parish, and felt prompted to speak in tongues over them. When he had finished, they looked at him wide-eyed, and said, "Fr. Coughlin, you're weird!"
"Why?" he asked.
"We had no idea you spoke Malaysian!"
"I don't," he replied. "What did I say?"
"You prayed the Our Father. But you prayed it weird. You said, 'Our Father, who art in heaven. Our Father, hallowed be Thy name. Our Father, Thy kingdom come...'"

Now, obviously I'm not going to sit here and say that every experience of glossolalia is inspired by the Holy Spirit. The devil is the great ape of God, after all. Your point about oneness pentecostals is well taken. But to simply deny any such manifestations are of the Holy Spirit is the equal and opposite error, in my opinion.