Thursday, November 20, 2008

Excessive Abuses in the Use of Lay Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion in America



[ source ]


It is completely understandable that many people are outraged by abuses in the Mass. When the rubrics are violated it is scandalous and the laity have every right to protest and try to reform the mistaken, erroneous, improper practices.

Lots of things are routinely violated. For example, the use of Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion is supposed to be restricted to, well, "extraordinary" circumstances (hence the name). As we know, that guideline is hardly ever applied. The Vatican document Inaestimabile Donum (1980) stated:
The faithful, whether religious or lay, who are authorized as extraordinary ministers of the Eucharist can distribute Communion only when there is no priest, deacon, or acolyte, when the priest is impeded by illness or advanced age, or when the number of the faithful going to Communion is so large as to make the celebration of the Mass excessively long.

(Instruction Concerning Worship of the Eucharistic Mystery, by the Sacred Congregation for the Sacraments and Divine Worship; Approved and Confirmed by His Holiness Pope John Paul II April 17, 1980; section 10)
This instruction was strongly reiterated in 1987. Catholic apologist Jimmy Akin devotes five pages to the topic (pp. 51-55), nailing down the point repeatedly, in his book Mass Confusion: The Do's and Don'ts of Catholic Worship (San Diego: Catholic Answers, 1999).

Likewise, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, also a very able and knowledgeable Catholic apologist, is most emphatic about the widespread abuses in this regard:
The Holy Father is most concerned that this permission is improperly used in the United States, indeed that it is grossly abused. . . .

The adjective "extraordinary" sets the tone -- they are to be used in extraordinary circumstances and having them every week or even every day hardly sounds extraordinary . . .

The Holy See views the use of extraordinary ministers as an unusual occurrence, resulting from emergency situations; thus it regards the present American scene as anomalous at best and aberrant at worst. I could not state the case any stronger . . .

I don't know how it is possible to applaud something so blatantly wrong and in violation of all liturgical norms, and done on so grand a scale in our country. In general, I do not think most extraordinary ministers are to blame personally; rather, they have been sold a bill of goods by their priests who, for a variety of reasons, wish to pass off this unique aspect of their ministry to the unordained . . .

What I have said to this point faithfully reflects Church teaching and discipline. Any person of good will can readily perceive that; those of bad will shall not accept it, regardless of how often the case is argued. . . .

This is one of the most serious problems to emerge in the postconciliar Church in America, since it touches on the very heart of Catholic Faith and practice . . .

The improper use of extraordinary ministers of the Eucharist is, of course, a violation of correct liturgical procedure. However, two other serious problems also present themselves: a lost sense of the sacred and a distorted view of the lay apostolate . . .

By permitting nearly anyone at all to distribute the Eucharist, we are communicating a message at the symbolic level that this action is really not all that special . . . Pope John Paul II criticized the abuse of the permission for extraordinary ministers as "reprehensible." . . .

One final area of concern revolves around the significance of the lay apostolate. It never ceases to amaze me as a priest that when I invite people to become active in the work of the Church, almost invariably they volunteer for liturgical ministries. This demonstrates that Vatican II is still not fully understood. The whole point of the council's theology of the laity was that the laity had their own unique role to play in bringing the Gospel to contemporary humanity -- in the world, not in the sanctuary. . . .

The role of the priest is to preach and administer the sacraments, so that the laity can be faithful witnesses in the world, thus inviting people there to follow Christ. . . .

Please note that we are not concerned with heresy here but with an imprudent, unwise liturgical practice, reflective of bad sociology. Like other Americanisms in the Church, this one fails to take a holistic view of reality, neglects long-range implications, and does not take seriously the nonverbal, symbolic power of liturgical communication.

(The Catholic Answer Book, Huntington, Indiana: Our Sunday Visitor, 1990, pp. 90-94; from published articles in The Catholic Answer magazine between 1987 and 1990)
Pope John Paul II alluded to the abuses in his encyclical Christifideles Laici (The Vocation and Mission of the Lay Faithful in the Church and the World: 30 December 1988):
In the same Synod Assembly, however, a critical judgment was voiced along with these positive elements, about a too- indiscriminate use of the word "ministry," the confusion and equating of the common priesthood and the ministerial priesthood, the lack of observance of ecclesiastical laws and norms, the arbitrary interpretation of the concept of "supply," the tendency toward a "clericalization" of the lay faithful and the risk of creating, in reality, an ecclesial structure of parallel service to that founded on the Sacrament of Orders.

(section 23)
By no means is all concern for a traditional, reverent Mass according to the rubrics that Holy Mother Church has established, of right wing radtrad extremist origin. I am of this thinking myself, and I have very little tolerance for the radtrads, having written a book critiquing them and also having maintained a web page detailing their errors for many years. No one would ever accuse me of being soft on them!

For further related reading, see:

Extraordinary Ministers of the Eucharist, Peter A. Kwasniewski (The Catholic Faith, Vol. 6, No. 6, November / December 2000)

Instruction on Certain Questions Regarding the Collaboration of the Non-Ordained Faithful in the Sacred Ministry of Priest (Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Vatican City, 1997)

The Proper Use of Extraordinary Ministers of the Eucharist, Fr. Peter M.J. Stravinskas (PDF file)

Lay ministers of the Eucharist are supposed to be 'extraordinary', Noelle Hiester

Vatican instruction on the Eucharist to avoid abuses, Francis Cardinal Arinze (23 April 2004; excerpts: see the last section)

Liturgical Roles in the Eucharistic Celebration, Francis Cardinal Arinze (from his book, Celebrating the Holy Eucharist)

3 comments:

Nicholas Hardesty said...

This is so entrenched it's nearly impossible to even bring it up. I fear saying anything about this, and I'm the DRE of the parish. The only way this will change is if the pastors themselves wake up and realize what they're doing, or if enough people in a parish actually came together as one voice against it. Some pastors are more conservative than others, but NO pastor likes an uproar!

James said...

Good post ! We need to talk about this more. The solution requires us to think outside the box, but it isn't impossible.
As Nicholas says, first must come the bravery of the pastor to address it with sensitivity and firmness. Good catechesis and incremental change are key.
How's this for a solution ?
A. Communion by intinction,thus eliminating the need for chalice "ministers"
B. Have a deacon or associate priest (even if it isn't "his" Mass) as the second ordinary minister.

It is my belief that 2 ordinary ministers can handle the communicants at any normal Mass, weekday or weekend. Sure, people may have to wait up to 15 WHOLE MINUTES to receive. I know a lot of people think that is excessive, but they don't think twice about being stuck in traffic for double that time every day. Is there anything we have to wait in line for that is more important than the Precious Body and Blood ? Anything ?

We have to get away from the thinking that "participation" means taking on clerical duties, and that we have to get out of Mass within 60 minutes tops. This is do-able, but it will take backbone and solid teaching on the part of the clergy.

(By the way, I am an extraordinary minister at my parish)

Dave Armstrong said...

Thanks so much for your input, James.