Table of Contents:
I. Relationship of the Bible to the Church
II. Tradition (Apostolic)
III. Sola Scriptura (Scripture as the Only Infallible Authority)
IV. Private Judgment
V. Perspicuity (Clearness) of Scripture
VI. Material and Formal Sufficiency of Scripture
VII. The Canon of Scripture
VIII. Deuterocanonical Books (So-Called "Apocrypha")
IX. Alleged Biblical Contradictions and Difficulties
I. Relationship of the Bible to the Church
The Catholic Church Has Always Been the Enemy of the Bible (???)
Luther's Lie About the Supposed Utter Obscurity of the Bible Before His Translation
Luther's Lie About the Supposed Utter Obscurity of the Bible Before His Translation
Dialogue with an Anglican on the Catholic Understanding of the Relationship of Scripture, Tradition, and the Church (vs. Jon Jacobson)
Basic Catholic-Protestant Differences Regarding Authority, or the "Rule of Faith": A Summary [Facebook]
The Protestant "Either/Or" Mindset and Sola Scriptura [Facebook]
A Few Thoughts on The Bible (TV Miniseries) [Facebook]
Basic Catholic-Protestant Differences Regarding Authority, or the "Rule of Faith": A Summary [Facebook]
The Protestant "Either/Or" Mindset and Sola Scriptura [Facebook]
A Few Thoughts on The Bible (TV Miniseries) [Facebook]
The Canon of Scripture: Did the Catholic Church Create It Or Merely Authoritatively Acknowledge It? (with Kevin Johnson)
"I Don't Enjoy Reading the Bible": Some Suggestions to Help Folks Better Enjoy and Benefit From Bible-Reading

Sola Scriptura vs. Ephesians 4 and St. Paul's Word Selection: Scripture(s), Tradition, and Church (+ Body)
Was the Catholic Church an Avowed Enemy of Scripture in the Middle Ages (or at any other time)?
Nicholas Cardinal Wiseman on Catholic Bibles in the Vernacular Before Luther [Facebook]
Nicholas Cardinal Wiseman on Catholic Bibles in the Vernacular Before Luther [Facebook]
Apostolic Succession Based on Biblical Data / Supposed "Prooftexting" and Protestant Reluctance to Discuss Bible Text Interpretations With Catholics
Reply to Protestant Apologist Jason Engwer's "The Canon and Church Infallibility" (An Alleged Disproof of Catholic Development of Doctrine) (+ Pt. II / Pt. III / Pt. IV)
[PAPERBACK: CATHOLIC ANSWERS ($12.95 LIST] [PAPERBACK: AMAZON ($12.95 LIST)] [PAPERBACK: BARNES & NOBLE ($12.95 LIST)] [KINDLE: 9.95] [NOOK: 9.95] [CATHOLIC ANSWERS E-BOOK: 9.99]
Be sure to patronize your local Catholic bookstores. They can order any book of mine for you.
II. Tradition (Apostolic)
Why We Need More Than the Bible (my talk on Catholic Answers Live: 10-10-03. Real Audio file)
Unanimous Consent" of the Church Fathers (Steve Ray)
Biblical Evidence for Submission to Church Authority and Apostolic Tradition / Biblical Condemnation of the Rebellion of the Protestant Revolt
Biblical Evidence for Submission to Church Authority and Apostolic Tradition / Biblical Condemnation of the Rebellion of the Protestant Revolt
Dialogue on "Tradition" in the New Testament (vs. Eric Svendsen)
Refutation of Protestant Polemicist William Webster's Critique of Catholic Tradition and Newmanian Development of Doctrine (vs. William Webster)
Anglican Anti-Traditional Principles of "Development" and the "Cult of Uncertainty" (vs. Dr. Edwin Tait)
Response to Rev. Michael Pahls on "Theological Humility" and the Protestant "Non-Quest" Regarding Christian Certainty (vs. Rev. Michael Pahls)

III. Sola Scriptura
Nicholas Cardinal Wiseman: If Sola Scriptura is True, Why Were There Virtually No Vernacular Versions of the Bible in the Early Church? [Facebook]
1 Corinthians 4:6 as a Supposed Prooftext for Sola Scriptura [Facebook]
1 Corinthians 4:6 as a Supposed Prooftext for Sola Scriptura [Facebook]
The Old Testament, the Ancient Jews, and Sola Scriptura
Reply to Protestant Apologist Jason Engwer's "The Canon and Church Infallibility" (An Alleged Disproof of Catholic Development of Doctrine) (+ Pt. II / Pt. III / Pt. IV)
Reply to Protestant Apologist Jason Engwer's "The Canon and Church Infallibility" (An Alleged Disproof of Catholic Development of Doctrine) (+ Pt. II / Pt. III / Pt. IV)
Dialogue With Protestant Apologist Jason Engwer on the Rule of Faith in the Church Fathers, Part One (Papias)
Papias, Scripture, and Tradition (Round Two): Dialogue With Protestant Apologist Jason Engwer / Sadly Typical End of Discourse With Anti-Catholics
Papias, Scripture, and Tradition (Round Two): Dialogue With Protestant Apologist Jason Engwer / Sadly Typical End of Discourse With Anti-Catholics
Priests, Levites, and Josiah's Destruction of the High Places: Closer to Sola Scriptura or Catholicism? (+ Part Two / Part Three / Part Four / Part Five) (vs. "CPA")
A Refutation of the Fallacies and Circular Reasoning of James White Regarding "Moses' Seat," Authentic Tradition, and Sola Scriptura (vs. James White)
Refutation of James White: Moses' Seat, the Bible, and Tradition (Introduction) (+ Part I | Part II | Part III | Part IV | Part V | Part VI | Parts VII and VIII)
Biblia y Tradición: Mantened la Tradición . . . [Bible and Tradition: "Maintain the traditions . . ."]
The Novel and Unbiblical Doctrine of Sola Scriptura (vs. Steve Parks [Lutheran] )
Nicholas Cardinal Wiseman: If Sola Scriptura is True, Why Were There Virtually No Vernacular Versions of the Bible in the Early Church? [Facebook]
Cardinal Wiseman on Quick Mass Baptisms in the Book of Acts as a Proof of the Profound Authority of the Catholic Church and Binding of New Converts to Even its Future Decrees [Facebook]
Nicholas Cardinal Wiseman: If Sola Scriptura is True, Why Were There Virtually No Vernacular Versions of the Bible in the Early Church? [Facebook]
Cardinal Wiseman on Quick Mass Baptisms in the Book of Acts as a Proof of the Profound Authority of the Catholic Church and Binding of New Converts to Even its Future Decrees [Facebook]
How Different (In Nature and Ultimate Effect) Are SolO Scriptura and SolA Scriptura? (+ Part II) (vs. Keith Mathison)
Dialogue With a Baptist About Sola Scriptura, Keith Mathison's Fallacious Critiques of Catholic Ecclesiology, and Anti-Catholicism
Reply to C. Michael Patton on Sola Scriptura, Part One (Definitions and Introduction)
Reply to C. Michael Patton on Sola Scriptura, Part Two
Reply to C. Michael Patton on Sola Scriptura, Part Three (Dual-Source Theory)
Reply to C. Michael Patton on Sola Scriptura, Part Four (Tradition and Apostolic Succession)
Reply to C. Michael Patton on Sola Scriptura, Part Five (The Canon)
Reply to C. Michael Patton on Sola Scriptura, Part Six (Divisions)
Lively Debate on Sola Scriptura and the Perspicuity (Clearness) of Scripture With Two Protestants in the CARM Chat Room
Biblical Proof of Church Infallibility and Disproof of Sola Scriptura in One Bible Verse (1 Timothy 3:15) -- Reinforced by Closely Related Cross-References
Do I Know and Understand the Definition of Sola Scriptura (Let's Have Some Fun With This One)?
The Jerusalem Council (Acts 15:6-30) vs. Sola Scriptura and James White (vs. James White)
Dialogue with Two Protestants on the Irrational, Unbiblical Protestant Demand for Multiple, Explicit Scriptural Prooftexts for Every Doctrine (Especially Marian Doctrine): The Virgin Birth as a Difficulty for This View
The Bereans and "Searching the Scriptures": Biblical Proofs of the Man-Made Protestant Tradition of Sola Scriptura?
Reply to C. Michael Patton on Sola Scriptura, Part Two
Reply to C. Michael Patton on Sola Scriptura, Part Three (Dual-Source Theory)
Reply to C. Michael Patton on Sola Scriptura, Part Four (Tradition and Apostolic Succession)
Reply to C. Michael Patton on Sola Scriptura, Part Five (The Canon)
Reply to C. Michael Patton on Sola Scriptura, Part Six (Divisions)
Lively Debate on Sola Scriptura and the Perspicuity (Clearness) of Scripture With Two Protestants in the CARM Chat Room
Biblical Proof of Church Infallibility and Disproof of Sola Scriptura in One Bible Verse (1 Timothy 3:15) -- Reinforced by Closely Related Cross-References
Do I Know and Understand the Definition of Sola Scriptura (Let's Have Some Fun With This One)?
The Jerusalem Council (Acts 15:6-30) vs. Sola Scriptura and James White (vs. James White)
Reply to Jason Engwer's Catholic But Not Roman Catholic Series on the Church Fathers: Sola Scriptura (An In-Depth Analysis of Ten Church Fathers' Views Pertaining to the Rule of Faith) (+ Part Two) (vs. Jason Engwer)
Dialogue on Sola Scriptura and the Church Fathers (+ Part Two) (vs. Jason Engwer)Dialogue with Two Protestants on the Irrational, Unbiblical Protestant Demand for Multiple, Explicit Scriptural Prooftexts for Every Doctrine (Especially Marian Doctrine): The Virgin Birth as a Difficulty for This View
The Bereans and "Searching the Scriptures": Biblical Proofs of the Man-Made Protestant Tradition of Sola Scriptura?
Critique of: Denying Sola Scriptura: The Attempt to Neutralize the Bible (by Gary DeMar) (vs. Gary DeMar)
Reply to a Protestant Who Claims That I Have Not Demonstrated That Protestant Authority Structures Are Ultimately Self-Defeating (vs. Kevin Davis)
Dialogue on Lutheranism and Catholicism, Part Two: Church Fathers + Sola Scriptura (vs. Nathan Rinne)
Dialogue on Lutheranism and Catholicism, Part Four: Rule of Faith, the Fathers, and Ecclesiology (vs. Nathan Rinne)
Reply to Lutheran Nathan Rinne: Exegetical Exposition on Whether the "Leaven" of the Pharisees is Hypocrisy or Doctrinal Falsehood
Dialogue on Lutheranism and Catholicism, Part Two: Church Fathers + Sola Scriptura (vs. Nathan Rinne)
Dialogue on Lutheranism and Catholicism, Part Four: Rule of Faith, the Fathers, and Ecclesiology (vs. Nathan Rinne)
Reply to Lutheran Nathan Rinne: Exegetical Exposition on Whether the "Leaven" of the Pharisees is Hypocrisy or Doctrinal Falsehood
400 Million "Popes": Protestant First Principles on Authority Are Inevitably Arbitrary, Unbiblical, and Viciously Self-Contradictory (vs. Ken Temple)
The Logical Circularity and Hidden Premises of Sola Scriptura and Private Judgment (with Brent Arias)
Catholic vs. Protestant Conceptions of the Meaning and Consequences of Private Judgment (Including Lengthy Citations From Reformed Protestants Arthur W. Pink, Archibald Bruce, and Charles Hodge, Four Protestant Confessions, and Catholic John Henry Newman)
[PAPERBACK: List: $19.95 / 25% Lulu Discount: $14.96] [E-PUB: 6.99] [PDF: 2.99] [KINDLE: 6.99] [NOOK: 6.99] [iTUNES: 6.99] [LOGOS BIBLE SOFTWARE: ONE OF TEN BOOKS; LOGOS SEARCH CAPABILITY]
"Me, My Bible, and the Holy Spirit" (The Relationship of the Church to the Judgment of Individuals in the Matter of Authoritative Biblical Interpretation. Does the Church Require a Particular Meaning for Each Passage?)
Dialogue on the Alleged "Perspicuous Apostolic Message" as a Proof of the Quasi-Protestantism of the Early Church (vs. Eric Svendsen and James White)
Lively Debate on Sola Scriptura and the Perspicuity (Clearness) of Scripture With Two Protestants in the CARM Chat Room
Dialogue With a Catholic on the Perspicuity (Clearness) of Scripture, and the Definition of Christian in Relation to the Holy Trinity (+ Part Two)
The Perspicuity (Clarity) of the Bible
Dialogue on Whether the Fathers Taught "Perspicuity" of Scripture and Denied the Necessity of Tradition and an Authoritative Church (vs. Carmen Bryant)
Lively Debate on Sola Scriptura and the Perspicuity (Clearness) of Scripture With Two Protestants in the CARM Chat Room
Dialogue With a Catholic on the Perspicuity (Clearness) of Scripture, and the Definition of Christian in Relation to the Holy Trinity (+ Part Two)
The Perspicuity (Clarity) of the Bible
Dialogue on Whether the Fathers Taught "Perspicuity" of Scripture and Denied the Necessity of Tradition and an Authoritative Church (vs. Carmen Bryant)
The Sufficiency of Scripture and the Church Fathers (Particularly, St. Athanasius and the Trinity) (vs. E. L. Hamilton and "Cranmer")
VII. The Canon of Scripture
Dialogue: Are All the Biblical Books Self-Evidently Inspired and Canonical? (+ Parts Two | Three) (vs. Ken Temple)
Did St. Paul and Other Biblical Writers Always Necessarily Know That What They Were Writing Was Inspired Scripture? / NT Prophets (vs. Ken Temple)
Reply to a Protestant Counter-Response on Development of Doctrine (Particularly With Regard to the New Testament Canon and the Papacy) (vs. Jason Engwer)
Further Dialogue With an Evangelical Protestant on Various Aspects of Development of Doctrine (Particularly Concerning the Canon of Scripture) (vs. Jason Engwer)
Reply to Protestant Apologist Jason Engwer's "The Canon and Church Infallibility" (An Alleged Disproof of Catholic Development of Doctrine) (+ Pt. II / Pt. III / Pt. IV)
Dialogue With Protestant Apologist Jason Engwer on the Rule of Faith in the Church Fathers, Part One (Papias)
Papias, Scripture, and Tradition (Round Two): Dialogue With Protestant Apologist Jason Engwer / Sadly Typical End of Discourse With Anti-Catholics
Papias, Scripture, and Tradition (Round Two): Dialogue With Protestant Apologist Jason Engwer / Sadly Typical End of Discourse With Anti-Catholics
The "Apocrypha": Why It's Part of the Bible (see also the Spanish version)
Dialogue on Objections to the "Apocrypha" (vs. Dr. Norman Geisler)
Ten Likely Deuterocanonical References in the New Testament [Facebook]
Catholic Resources for the Greek Septuagint and the Deuterocanonical Books of the Old Testament (Links Page)
Orthodox View of OT Canon / Athanasius' Slightly-Qualified Acceptance of the Deuterocanon / Jerome's Anomalies in His Rejection of the Deuterocanon
James White's Deficient Research: Counting Numbers at Trent (Regarding the Canon) / Gary Michuta's Deuterocanon Web Page
John Calvin's Citations of Deuterocanonical Books (So-Called "Apocrypha"): Documented Instances
Dialogue on Objections to the "Apocrypha" (vs. Dr. Norman Geisler)
Ten Likely Deuterocanonical References in the New Testament [Facebook]
Catholic Resources for the Greek Septuagint and the Deuterocanonical Books of the Old Testament (Links Page)
Orthodox View of OT Canon / Athanasius' Slightly-Qualified Acceptance of the Deuterocanon / Jerome's Anomalies in His Rejection of the Deuterocanon
James White's Deficient Research: Counting Numbers at Trent (Regarding the Canon) / Gary Michuta's Deuterocanon Web Page
John Calvin's Citations of Deuterocanonical Books (So-Called "Apocrypha"): Documented Instances
Reply Concerning the Canonicity of the So-Called "Apocrypha" (vs. Dr. John Ankerberg and Dr. John Weldon)
Possible References to the Deuterocanon (aka "Apocrypha") in the New Testament (RSV) (+ Parts Two | Three | Four | Five | Six | Seven | Eight | Nine)

IX. Alleged Biblical Contradictions and Difficulties
Master List / Resources
Jesus
Genealogies of Jesus Christ: Do Matthew and Luke Contradict? (Catholic Resources)
The Lord's Prayer (Our Father): Is "Debts" or "Trespasses" the More Accurate Translation?
Second Reply to Atheist Mitch / "ProfMTH" Regarding Christian Apologists' Allegedly Dishonest Interpretation of the Messianic Prophecy, Isaiah 53
The Lord's Prayer (Our Father): Is "Debts" or "Trespasses" the More Accurate Translation?
Second Reply to Atheist Mitch / "ProfMTH" Regarding Christian Apologists' Allegedly Dishonest Interpretation of the Messianic Prophecy, Isaiah 53
Supposed Contradictions in the Gospel Accounts of Jesus' Calling of the Disciples (edited and compiled by Dave Armstrong)
Census and Jesus' Birth in Bethlehem: Atheist John W. Loftus' Irrational and Uninformed Criticisms of the Biblical Accounts
Related to Jesus
Reply to a Skeptic Regarding Elijah the Prophet's Extraordinary Departure From Earth and Relation to John the Baptist (vs. "paul")
Dialogue With a Skeptic Regarding Elijah and John the Baptist, Round Two (vs. "paul")
Alleged Contradictions Regarding the Twelve Disciples of Jesus (vs. atheist "DagoodS")
St. Peter's Denials and the Cock's Crows: A Biblical Contradiction?
St. Peter's Denials and the Cock's Crows: A Biblical Contradiction?
Miscellaneous
Refutation of Atheists' Alleged Biblical "Contradictions" Concerning Salvation and Supposed Annihilationism and Universalism (vs. Dr. Ted Drange)
Adam and Eve and Other Early Figures
Defending the Literal, Historical Adam of the Genesis Account (vs. Catholic Eric S. Giunta)
Where Did Cain Get His Wife? [Facebook]
The Hittites
Massacres and Wars of Annihilation / God's Judgment
God and Evil
On the Alleged Contradictions of 2 Samuel 24, and 1 Chronicles 21 and 27 (vs. atheist "DagoodS")
The Psalms
Reply to "The Problem of Pain and the Egomania of the Psalms" (vs. Ed Babinski [agnostic])
Second Reply to Agnostic Ed Babinski on the Supposed Irrationality and Immorality of the Psalms and the Christian Worldview (vs. Ed Babinski)
Postscript to Dialogue With Agnostic Ed Babinski on the Psalms, Etc.: Ed's Attempt to Enlist an Ancient Near East Scholar in Support Backfires (Dr. James Roger Black vs. Ed Babinski; compiled and additional commentary by Dave Armstrong)
Second Reply to Agnostic Ed Babinski on the Supposed Irrationality and Immorality of the Psalms and the Christian Worldview (vs. Ed Babinski)
Postscript to Dialogue With Agnostic Ed Babinski on the Psalms, Etc.: Ed's Attempt to Enlist an Ancient Near East Scholar in Support Backfires (Dr. James Roger Black vs. Ed Babinski; compiled and additional commentary by Dave Armstrong)
Last updated on 7 May 2013.
*****








9 comments:
Dave, I have a couple questions.
I'm currently in a Jesus of Nazareth class taught at a University by an Anglican Priest. He does not believe in Biblical innerancy. Am I right in thinking Catholicism does believe the Bible is 100% inerrant? I've read a couple encylicals - one in the early 1900s and another in the 1960s if I remember right - where the Pope stated that the Bible was 100% inspired and thus 100% inerrant. Am I right in thinking this is actually a *dogmatic* article of faith?
Second, if this is so, how are certain contradictions reconciled? For instance, today he read us all 4 Gospel accounts of the Empty Tomb. They differed substantially. And also there are the differing accounts of Paul's conversion in Acts. In one telling the men did not hear Christ speaking, and in the next they did. How are these things dealt with by the Church?
Thanks again, and God bless.
Hi Chris.
If you google church fathers,and then click church fathers home,after that go to saint augustine ,and one of the many many things which he wrote is called.- The Harmony of the Gospels ,in there you will find the answers which you are looking for about what some people believe to be contradiction in the bible.
And yes you are right that the catholic church believe that the bible is inerrant and is inspired by the Holy Spirit and as though it has God as it`s author.
GBU
Hi Chris again.
For example in the same encyclopedia,when you go to church fathers,you could also check John Crysostom`s explanations of the acts of the apostles in homelies 19 and 47 , as for your first question plz check Augustine`s harmony of the gospels, book III .
GBU
The Church holds that the manuscripts are inerrant and infallible, yes. Some minor errors may have slipped in due to faulty copying.
Most so-called "contradictions" are easily explained as complementaries in some fashion.
See the final section: "Alleged Biblical Contradictions and Difficulties" -- of my Bible, Church, Tradition, & Canon page:
http://socrates58.blogspot.com/2006/11/bible-church-tradition-canon-index.html
Coul you answer these questions (about tradition, scripture etc.?
http://www.bible.ca/catholic-questions.htm Irrefutable questions that Roman Catholics and Orthodox can’t answer
I'm sure I could (and have). I've written more about sola Scriptura and related issues than anything else, including a book with 620 separate arguments in it.
As a matter of policy, I no longer interact with anti-Catholics, because of the futility of all such efforts for ten years online, excepting historically important ones like Luther and Calvin.
Dave,
I've researched the supposed "contradictions" and find all the accusations unfounded. I do not blame you either for not engaging in such pointless arguments. Anyone who wants to study and learn has all the tools they need at your site, which, as I think I've said before, is one of the reasons I'm becoming Catholic.
Thanks Dave, I'm trying to spread the word about your amazing site.
Thanks for the plugs!
Sdhshh wrote , Irrefutable questions that Roman Catholics and Orthodox can’t answer.
Woahahahaha , one of the funniest statements i have ever read...lol
Post a Comment